Conectar
Mental Health Literacy (MHL) is important for improving mental health and reducing inequities in treatment. The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS) is a valid and reliable assessment tool for MHL. This systematic review will examine and compare the measurement properties of the MHLS in different languages, enabling academics, clinicians and policymakers to make informed judgements regarding its use in assessments.
The review will adhere to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures and the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Manual for Evidence Synthesis and will be presented following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist. The review will be conducted in four stages, including an initial search confined to PubMed, a search of electronic scientific databases PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase (Elsevier), PubMed (NLM) and ERIC, an examination of the reference lists of all papers to locate relevant publications and finally contacting the MHLS original author to identify validation studies that the searches will not retrieve. These phases will assist us in locating studies that evaluate the measurement properties of MHLS across various populations, demographics and contexts. The search will focus on articles published in English between May 2015 and December 2023. The methodological quality of the studies will be evaluated using the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and a comprehensive qualitative and quantitative data synthesis will be performed.
Ethics approval is not required. The publication will be in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.
CRD42023430924.
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative research approach that equally engages researchers and community stakeholders throughout all steps of the research process to facilitate social change and increase research relevance. Community advisory boards (CABs) are a CBPR tool in which individuals with lived experience and community organisations are integrated into the research process and ensure the work aligns with community priorities. We seek to (1) explore the best practices for the recruitment and engagement of people with lived experiences on CABs and (2) identify the scope of literature on minimising power dynamics between organisations and community members with lived experience who work on CABs together.
This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley methodological framework, informed by Levac et al, and will be reported using a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram. Detailed and robust search strategies have been developed for Embase, Medline and PsychINFO. Grey literature references and reference lists of included articles published between 1 January 1990 and 30 March 2023 will be considered. Two reviewers will independently screen references in two successive stages of title/abstract and full-text screening. Conflicts will be decided by consensus or a third reviewer. Thematic analysis will be applied in three phases: open coding, axial coding and abstraction. Extracted data will be recorded and presented in a tabular format and/or graphical summaries, with a descriptive overview discussing how the research findings relate to the research questions. At this time, a preliminary search of peer-reviewed and grey literature has been conducted. Search results for peer-reviewed literature have been uploaded to Covidence for review and appraisal for relevance.
Formal ethics approval is not required for this review. Review findings will inform ongoing and future CBPR community advisory board dynamics.
The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QF5D3)
by Nanako Takaoka, Michiko Yamane, Ayami Hasegawa, Koya Obara, Kyoumi Shirai, Ryoichi Aki, Hiroyasu Hatakeyama, Yuko Hamada, Nobuko Arakawa, Manabu Tanaka, Robert M. Hoffman, Yasuyuki Amoh
There has been only limited success to differentiate adult stem cells into cardiomyocyte subtypes. In the present study, we have successfully induced beating atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes from rat hair-follicle-associated pluripotent (HAP) stem cells, which are adult stem cells located in the bulge area. HAP stem cells differentiated into atrial cardiomyocytes in culture with the combination of isoproterenol, activin A, bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and cyclosporine A (CSA). HAP stem cells differentiated into ventricular cardiomyocytes in culture with the combination of activin A, BMP4, bFGF, inhibitor of Wnt production-4 (IWP4), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Differentiated atrial cardiomyocytes were specifically stained for anti-myosin light chain 2a (MLC2a) antibody. Ventricular cardiomyocytes were specially stained for anti-myosin light chain 2v (MLC2v) antibody. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) showed significant expression of MLC2a in atrial cardiomyocytes and MLC2v in ventricular cardiomyocytes. Both differentiated atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes showed characteristic waveforms in Ca2+ imaging. Differentiated atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes formed long myocardial fibers and beat as a functional syncytium, having a structure similar to adult cardiomyocytes. The present results demonstrated that it is possible to induce cardiomyocyte subtypes, atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, from HAP stem cells.by Samantha Young, Tara Gomes, Gillian Kolla, Daniel McCormack, Zoë Dodd, Janet Raboud, Ahmed M. Bayoumi
AimsCalls to prescribe safer supply hydromorphone (SSHM) as an alternative to the toxic drug supply increased during the COVID-19 pandemic but it is unknown whether prescribing behaviour was altered. We aimed to evaluate how the number of new SSHM dispensations changed during the pandemic in Ontario.
MethodsWe conducted a retrospective interrupted time-series analysis using provincial administrative databases. We counted new SSHM dispensations in successive 28-day periods from March 22, 2016 to August 30, 2021. We used segmented Poisson regression methods to test for both a change in level and trend of new dispensations before and after March 17, 2020, the date Ontario’s pandemic-related emergency was declared. We adjusted the models to account for seasonality and assessed for over-dispersion and residual autocorrelation. We used counterfactual analysis methods to estimate the number of new dispensations attributable to the pandemic.
ResultsWe identified 1489 new SSHM dispensations during the study period (434 [mean of 8 per 28-day period] before and 1055 [mean of 56 per 28-day period] during the pandemic). Median age of individuals initiating SSHM was 40 (interquartile interval 33–48) with 61.7% (N = 919) male sex. Before the pandemic, there was a small trend of increased prescribing (incidence rate ratio [IRR] per period 1.002; 95% confidence interval [95CI] 1.001–1.002; p Conclusion
The pandemic led to an abrupt increase in SSHM prescribing in Ontario, although the rate of increase was similar before and during the pandemic. The absolute number of individuals who accessed SSHM remained low throughout the pandemic.
Commentary on: Paynter M, Heggie C, Low C, McKibbon S, Martin-Misener R. Community-based models of health care for women, trans and nonbinary people released from prisons: An international scoping review with implications for Canada. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jul;32(13-14):3277-3294. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16464. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
Women, transgender and non-binary people who experience incarceration often have complex healthcare needs and require dynamic, trauma-informed care in the community. Research is needed to understand how to address the diverse health needs of women, transgender and non-binary people leaving prison.
On any given day, approximately 740 000 women and girls
FreshRSS 